Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Perplexed" data-source="post: 4267350" data-attributes="member: 7157">I agree.  WK doesn’t just read the text of the ruling, he also offers some commentary on what the various provisions of the ruling mean.  Armed Scholar started out well early in his YT career, but I feel the quality of his videos has fallen off quite a bit since.  He also talks much faster than any other YT author I’ve ever seen - I’d have no clue what he was saying if it wasn’t for the captioning, and even that sometimes falls behind his rapid-fire delivery.Regarding the temporary injunction, hurrah.  But I found it curious that the ruling mentioned the potential inability of a gun owner to acquire a FFL as being grounds for appeal of the ATF’s “engaged in the business” rule.  I do not think it should be necessary for a gun owner to have to acquire a FFL to add to or dispose of his/her personal collection, just for the record; but I’m uncertain what could prevent such an owner from acquiring a FFL.  Is it cost-prohibitive such that it discriminates against persons in lower- or fixed-income brackets?</blockquote>