Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge retention
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1979802" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Well looking at the results for judicial appointments only confirms to me that Oklahoma voters haven't a clue as to who they're voting to retain. It's incredible how every one of those judges were retained by a 65-66% vote. Two thirds for and one third against. Every, last, one. No way they'd all be that close if people even knew who appointed each judge. <img src="/images/smilies/rolleyes2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes2" title="Rolleyes2 :rolleyes2" data-shortname=":rolleyes2" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1979802, member: 1132"] Well looking at the results for judicial appointments only confirms to me that Oklahoma voters haven't a clue as to who they're voting to retain. It's incredible how every one of those judges were retained by a 65-66% vote. Two thirds for and one third against. Every, last, one. No way they'd all be that close if people even knew who appointed each judge. :rolleyes2 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge retention
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom