Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of forcing kids to wear locator chips!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joeh" data-source="post: 2053639" data-attributes="member: 18680"><p>Bah...</p><p></p><p>Here is the actual ruling <a href="https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/01-08-2013_Hernandez_Ruling.pdf" target="_blank">Hernandez Ruling</a>.</p><p></p><p>The judge didn't rule in favor of forcing kids to do anything. If you read through the ruling, the judge specifically grants the right to wear a student ID badge, just like everyone else, WITHOUT an RFID locator chip in it. The father, and legal guardian, declined, citing "we MUST obey the word of God. By asking my daughter and our family to participate and 'FALL IN LINE LIKE THE REST OF THEM' is asking us to disobey our LORD and Savior."</p><p></p><p>The chips do not give specific locations, rather an approximate location (read: wing of the school) and serve mainly for identification purposes (just like you would check in at a school in Oklahoma). The badges do not work off school property.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Another part specifically from the ruling:</strong></p><p><strong><strong>Again, Plaintiff has been wearing a student ID badge for several years. She doesn't object to wearing her old ID badge, yet she objects to the new ID badge issued by Jay H.S. despite the fact that the chip has been removed. Plaintiff's objection to wearing the Smart ID badge without a chip is clearly a secular choice, rather than a religious concern.</strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong></strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong></strong></strong></p><p>Feel free to read through the ruling yourself, but the misrepresentation of this case on the internet is startling. I think people would have a different outlook if they familiarized themselves rather than trusting yahoo or bbc or whatever to report the actual unbiased truth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joeh, post: 2053639, member: 18680"] Bah... Here is the actual ruling [URL="https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/01-08-2013_Hernandez_Ruling.pdf"]Hernandez Ruling[/URL]. The judge didn't rule in favor of forcing kids to do anything. If you read through the ruling, the judge specifically grants the right to wear a student ID badge, just like everyone else, WITHOUT an RFID locator chip in it. The father, and legal guardian, declined, citing "we MUST obey the word of God. By asking my daughter and our family to participate and 'FALL IN LINE LIKE THE REST OF THEM' is asking us to disobey our LORD and Savior." The chips do not give specific locations, rather an approximate location (read: wing of the school) and serve mainly for identification purposes (just like you would check in at a school in Oklahoma). The badges do not work off school property. [B]Another part specifically from the ruling: [B]Again, Plaintiff has been wearing a student ID badge for several years. She doesn't object to wearing her old ID badge, yet she objects to the new ID badge issued by Jay H.S. despite the fact that the chip has been removed. Plaintiff's objection to wearing the Smart ID badge without a chip is clearly a secular choice, rather than a religious concern. [/B][/B] Feel free to read through the ruling yourself, but the misrepresentation of this case on the internet is startling. I think people would have a different outlook if they familiarized themselves rather than trusting yahoo or bbc or whatever to report the actual unbiased truth.[B][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of forcing kids to wear locator chips!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
