Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tulsamal" data-source="post: 2652760" data-attributes="member: 571">1) Judges shouldn&#039;t be on the ballot in the first place. There&#039;s the problem. If there is a bad judge, you put a removal process into motion. Their decisions are going to be unpopular many times but those decisions are supposed to be based on the law and not whether they can please the electorate.2) I&#039;m supposed to be against some judge because he performed the first gay wedding? In accordance with the law... that&#039;s what you are supposed to do... follow the law. Wouldn&#039;t he actually be one of those dreaded &quot;activist judges&quot; if he tried to oppose the law and somehow twist the process out as long as possible?I&#039;m a libertarian from top to bottom. I suspect many gun people are. And my libertarian views extend to all things.... it is none of my business if one man wants to marry another man. Why should it matter to me? More power to them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tulsamal, post: 2652760, member: 571"] 1) Judges shouldn't be on the ballot in the first place. There's the problem. If there is a bad judge, you put a removal process into motion. Their decisions are going to be unpopular many times but those decisions are supposed to be based on the law and not whether they can please the electorate. 2) I'm supposed to be against some judge because he performed the first gay wedding? In accordance with the law... that's what you are supposed to do... follow the law. Wouldn't he actually be one of those dreaded "activist judges" if he tried to oppose the law and somehow twist the process out as long as possible? I'm a libertarian from top to bottom. I suspect many gun people are. And my libertarian views extend to all things.... it is none of my business if one man wants to marry another man. Why should it matter to me? More power to them. [/QUOTE]

Verification