Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Katherine Forrest: A Constitutionalist Judge to Celebrate
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2095828" data-attributes="member: 7557"><p>What does "or associated forces mean? It could be argued that "or associated forces" are a part of Al-Qaeda, or ANY "associated force" that is completely unrelated to Al-Qaeda as Americans who can be indefinitely detained under the NDAA, without trial. It is my understanding that Judge Forrest ruled the NDAA is unconstitutional simply because "or associated forces" could be us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flybeech, post: 2095828, member: 7557"] What does "or associated forces mean? It could be argued that "or associated forces" are a part of Al-Qaeda, or ANY "associated force" that is completely unrelated to Al-Qaeda as Americans who can be indefinitely detained under the NDAA, without trial. It is my understanding that Judge Forrest ruled the NDAA is unconstitutional simply because "or associated forces" could be us. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Katherine Forrest: A Constitutionalist Judge to Celebrate
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
