Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 1420877" data-attributes="member: 423">I&#039;ve actually gotta say, I like a lot of what KT has been doing. Just wish they would up their quality just a bit, and get up to speed on production.The PF-9 I have is not the prettiest, nor most accurate, nor easiest to shoot of the pocket 9s, but it is sure is a great bang for the buck gun. And from what I can tell, it&#039;s as reliable as any of the others. Meaning shoot yours to make sure. It&#039;s competitive in size to the Kahr PM-9 and Rohrbaugh R9s, just slightly larger; however it is lighter than both. And you can buy 2 for the price of 1 PM-9, or 4:1 vs the Rohrbaugh.The Sub-2000 uses common mags, is reasonably accurate, and folds to a stupid short length. Even with .40, it&#039;s got very very little recoil. And with the longer barrel, it&#039;s quieter than a pistol. Again, for the price, what&#039;s not to like?The SU-16, offers lower price point than an AR, folds, uses AR mags and is pretty lightweight. Not a competitor to the AR, but for &quot;truck gun&quot; or &quot;ranch rifle&quot; use it makes sense. Also, with the flush fit 10rd mags and 2 spares in the stock, it&#039;s a lot handier than the AR platform.Need I mention the RFB?What I really want to see is a usable .22 lr conversion for the PF-9.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 1420877, member: 423"] I've actually gotta say, I like a lot of what KT has been doing. Just wish they would up their quality just a bit, and get up to speed on production. The PF-9 I have is not the prettiest, nor most accurate, nor easiest to shoot of the pocket 9s, but it is sure is a great bang for the buck gun. And from what I can tell, it's as reliable as any of the others. Meaning shoot yours to make sure. It's competitive in size to the Kahr PM-9 and Rohrbaugh R9s, just slightly larger; however it is lighter than both. And you can buy 2 for the price of 1 PM-9, or 4:1 vs the Rohrbaugh. The Sub-2000 uses common mags, is reasonably accurate, and folds to a stupid short length. Even with .40, it's got very very little recoil. And with the longer barrel, it's quieter than a pistol. Again, for the price, what's not to like? The SU-16, offers lower price point than an AR, folds, uses AR mags and is pretty lightweight. Not a competitor to the AR, but for "truck gun" or "ranch rifle" use it makes sense. Also, with the flush fit 10rd mags and 2 spares in the stock, it's a lot handier than the AR platform. Need I mention the RFB? What I really want to see is a usable .22 lr conversion for the PF-9. [/QUOTE]

Verification