Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Key difference between ALLOWING a NICS check versus MANDATING one
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2081140" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>abajaj11,</p><p></p><p>Having chewed this one over and over, I think I agree with you. I would like to see the ability to easily use NICS for non-FFL sales IF desired and agreed to by the parties involved. However, there is no need and, I agree with you here, there is a very real danger in accepting a mandate for same. Governments, all governments, naturally try to expand their own powers whether in the name of "efficiency" or ideology, or a desire to "help" all the "average Joe's" out there. The logical move from a bureaucratic organization would be to get a baseline of all currently owned guns (registration) in order to carry out the requirements of a mandatory background check law. Now add to that the ideological desire of this administration to disarm Americans who aren't government agents in some capacity and you get a toxic mix -- toxic to the 2nd Amendment and to American basic liberties.</p><p>I'll be composing some additional letters to my Federal and State elected representatives. I will also be writing to the RNC to remind them why I currently contribute and why I might stop in the future. While I am at it I will also fire one off to the NRA-ILA as well just to remind them too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2081140, member: 18914"] abajaj11, Having chewed this one over and over, I think I agree with you. I would like to see the ability to easily use NICS for non-FFL sales IF desired and agreed to by the parties involved. However, there is no need and, I agree with you here, there is a very real danger in accepting a mandate for same. Governments, all governments, naturally try to expand their own powers whether in the name of "efficiency" or ideology, or a desire to "help" all the "average Joe's" out there. The logical move from a bureaucratic organization would be to get a baseline of all currently owned guns (registration) in order to carry out the requirements of a mandatory background check law. Now add to that the ideological desire of this administration to disarm Americans who aren't government agents in some capacity and you get a toxic mix -- toxic to the 2nd Amendment and to American basic liberties. I'll be composing some additional letters to my Federal and State elected representatives. I will also be writing to the RNC to remind them why I currently contribute and why I might stop in the future. While I am at it I will also fire one off to the NRA-ILA as well just to remind them too. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Key difference between ALLOWING a NICS check versus MANDATING one
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom