Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Largest Wind Farm Built At Once In North America Now Running In Oklahoma
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HiredHand" data-source="post: 3767948" data-attributes="member: 2469"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2021/04/28/how-green-is-wind-power-really-a-new-report-tallies-up-the-carbon-cost-of-renewables/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>“Good news: amortizing the carbon cost over the decades-long lifespan of the equipment, Bernstein determined that wind power has a carbon footprint 99% less than coal-fired power plants, 98% less than natural gas, and a surprise 75% less than solar. More specifically, they figure that wind turbines average just 11 grams of CO2 emission per kilowatthour of electricity generated. That compares with 44 g/kwh for solar, 450 g for natural gas, and a whopping 1,000 g for coal.</p><p></p><p>But beating them all is the original large-scale zero-carbon power source, nuclear power, at 9 g/kwh. </p><p></p><p>Thanks to technology, these stats aren’t static. Offshore wind turbines are becoming enormous, with General Electric’s <a href="https://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric" target="_blank">GE</a> <a href="https://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric" target="_blank">-2.9%</a> Haliade X featuring blades 360 feet long and generating 14 megawatts. The carbon footprint of such monsters could get as low as 6 g/kwh. “</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HiredHand, post: 3767948, member: 2469"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2021/04/28/how-green-is-wind-power-really-a-new-report-tallies-up-the-carbon-cost-of-renewables/[/URL] “Good news: amortizing the carbon cost over the decades-long lifespan of the equipment, Bernstein determined that wind power has a carbon footprint 99% less than coal-fired power plants, 98% less than natural gas, and a surprise 75% less than solar. More specifically, they figure that wind turbines average just 11 grams of CO2 emission per kilowatthour of electricity generated. That compares with 44 g/kwh for solar, 450 g for natural gas, and a whopping 1,000 g for coal. But beating them all is the original large-scale zero-carbon power source, nuclear power, at 9 g/kwh. Thanks to technology, these stats aren’t static. Offshore wind turbines are becoming enormous, with General Electric’s [URL='https://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric']GE[/URL] [URL='https://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric']-2.9%[/URL] Haliade X featuring blades 360 feet long and generating 14 megawatts. The carbon footprint of such monsters could get as low as 6 g/kwh. “ [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Largest Wind Farm Built At Once In North America Now Running In Oklahoma
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom