Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GlockPride" data-source="post: 3586421" data-attributes="member: 12153"><p>You have to ask yourself, what would you have done? If you would not have shot, then is Bratcher guilty? If you would have shot, is he innocent?</p><p></p><p>case law in Oklahoma has proven, I believe, that merely trying to gain access to a prohibited place is grounds for self-defense. Others have been shot through a door and been upheld as self-defense. </p><p></p><p>This is a tough one. Depends on who is on the jury and how they see it. I could see if going either way. Have to go sit for it to play out. Could I convict based upon the few known facts? I don’t know if I could.</p><p></p><p>Do I think that the DA/just us system is double slapping him since his business license lapsed to set an example for anyone else considering the same thing? Absolutely they are sending a strong message. But when you agree to play in the game and “their system”, you’d better know and FOLLOW their “rules”.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GlockPride, post: 3586421, member: 12153"] You have to ask yourself, what would you have done? If you would not have shot, then is Bratcher guilty? If you would have shot, is he innocent? case law in Oklahoma has proven, I believe, that merely trying to gain access to a prohibited place is grounds for self-defense. Others have been shot through a door and been upheld as self-defense. This is a tough one. Depends on who is on the jury and how they see it. I could see if going either way. Have to go sit for it to play out. Could I convict based upon the few known facts? I don’t know if I could. Do I think that the DA/just us system is double slapping him since his business license lapsed to set an example for anyone else considering the same thing? Absolutely they are sending a strong message. But when you agree to play in the game and “their system”, you’d better know and FOLLOW their “rules”. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom