Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Las Vegas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3045411" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>To an extent I agree, but at the same time, we have such polarized opposites in the media from several sides, the only way something gets truly suppressed is at the highest levels of <strong>government</strong>, not the media. Anything turned up in the investigation should be released, and since there is no one to prosecute, there is no point in keeping information secret until trial to avoid poisoning a jury. The only exception I can see to this is if there is/was another actor in the plot, whom they are still seeking and don't want to flush out yet.</p><p></p><p>Do I believe the .gov would hide information? Absolutely... but there also has to be a gain in it for them. Personally, since I know the .gov absolutely loves to keep the "left" and "right" at each others' throats so they can benefit by the misdirection and the distraction, I see it being more useful to them to release any pertinent information (say the killer's political affiliations or left/right leanings), so they can continue playing the two ends against each other.</p><p></p><p>Just my assessment. I don't see anything of serious import being kept out of sight, unless it is a mandate from the very highest levels, and even then, I believe there are enough who both love and hate one side or the other, there would be a leak that would be impossible to plug.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3045411, member: 9374"] To an extent I agree, but at the same time, we have such polarized opposites in the media from several sides, the only way something gets truly suppressed is at the highest levels of [B]government[/B], not the media. Anything turned up in the investigation should be released, and since there is no one to prosecute, there is no point in keeping information secret until trial to avoid poisoning a jury. The only exception I can see to this is if there is/was another actor in the plot, whom they are still seeking and don't want to flush out yet. Do I believe the .gov would hide information? Absolutely... but there also has to be a gain in it for them. Personally, since I know the .gov absolutely loves to keep the "left" and "right" at each others' throats so they can benefit by the misdirection and the distraction, I see it being more useful to them to release any pertinent information (say the killer's political affiliations or left/right leanings), so they can continue playing the two ends against each other. Just my assessment. I don't see anything of serious import being kept out of sight, unless it is a mandate from the very highest levels, and even then, I believe there are enough who both love and hate one side or the other, there would be a leak that would be impossible to plug. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Las Vegas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom