Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Las Vegas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 3047117" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>I don’t see much in Tucker’s report, except someone trying really hard to make things look weird that aren’t.</p><p></p><p>A company being tight lipped about details surrounding a massive crime? See above about protection from liability.</p><p></p><p>If there’s a chance he was unlicensed or improperly licensed, the company isn’t go to just spill the beans to the first reporter who calls them up. I’m sure licensing requirements can be looked up on the internet, so calling the sheriff’s office and getting hung up on is a yawn (Took me two seconds to google them and find out that the sheriff is not the OPR for security guard licensing).</p><p></p><p>As far as traveling to Mexico...he’s not a suspect and he’s not under arrest so why would he be on a travel restriction? People living near the border go back and forth quite frequently.</p><p></p><p>Hard drive missing? No chance that paddock removed it/destroyed it prior to launching his attack right in order to cover his tracks? It has to be a conspiracy?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 3047117, member: 42"] I don’t see much in Tucker’s report, except someone trying really hard to make things look weird that aren’t. A company being tight lipped about details surrounding a massive crime? See above about protection from liability. If there’s a chance he was unlicensed or improperly licensed, the company isn’t go to just spill the beans to the first reporter who calls them up. I’m sure licensing requirements can be looked up on the internet, so calling the sheriff’s office and getting hung up on is a yawn (Took me two seconds to google them and find out that the sheriff is not the OPR for security guard licensing). As far as traveling to Mexico...he’s not a suspect and he’s not under arrest so why would he be on a travel restriction? People living near the border go back and forth quite frequently. Hard drive missing? No chance that paddock removed it/destroyed it prior to launching his attack right in order to cover his tracks? It has to be a conspiracy? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Las Vegas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom