Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2501388" data-attributes="member: 3099">Lockheed figured it out for their stuff of late.&nbsp; The F22 parts that I worked on had no issues with it.&nbsp; Same for F16, F35 and the latest revisions of C130.&nbsp; There was a &quot;company&quot; that did R&amp;D weapon systems for the military that I worked with some that was unbelievably bad.&nbsp; As a matter of fact I&#039;m not sure then had a &quot;draftsman&quot; on staff at all.&nbsp; But their 3D solid models were friggin perfect.&nbsp; All surfaces trimmed to perfection, we didn&#039;t have to do a thing to the models to put CNC path to them.&nbsp; But as for dimensioning and tolerancing, they had not a clue.As to the OP, I would absolutely love to have an 8 shot .357 magnum Super Redhawk.&nbsp; S&amp;W&#039;s 627 is the only game in town for USPSA revolver division and I like Ruger&#039;s cylinder release a whole lot better and the durability of the Rugers have no equal.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2501388, member: 3099"] Lockheed figured it out for their stuff of late. The F22 parts that I worked on had no issues with it. Same for F16, F35 and the latest revisions of C130. There was a "company" that did R&D weapon systems for the military that I worked with some that was unbelievably bad. As a matter of fact I'm not sure then had a "draftsman" on staff at all. But their 3D solid models were friggin perfect. All surfaces trimmed to perfection, we didn't have to do a thing to the models to put CNC path to them. But as for dimensioning and tolerancing, they had not a clue. As to the OP, I would absolutely love to have an 8 shot .357 magnum Super Redhawk. S&W's 627 is the only game in town for USPSA revolver division and I like Ruger's cylinder release a whole lot better and the durability of the Rugers have no equal. [/QUOTE]

Verification