Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lawmaker invites gun manufacturer to relocate to Sooner state
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ASP785" data-source="post: 2084224" data-attributes="member: 12170"><p>I am struggling to understand the points you are trying to make. You are simply quoting exisiting programs back to me, programs in which I am aware of. If you are only looking at payroll withholdings, the 10% wouldn't make sense. More manufacturing jobs increases the revenue generated by municipalties from things like sales and property taxes and supports further economic activity in service related industries. Without all the data, it is tough to quantify the economic impact.</p><p></p><p>When you stated ad valorem, I interpreted your post to mean an additional tax, hence why I thought you were suggesting a VAT. </p><p></p><p>The government can and does create jobs regularly. Saying it doesn't is misguided. However, that really wasn't my point, so I would have phrased it differently. My point was along the lines of what you stated, in that governmen'ts roll should be to foster the environment of economic activity.</p><p></p><p>If you are simply arguing for the sake of arguing, then this conversation will end here. I have nothing to prove over the internet. If you are wanting to dialogue on legitimate ideas to increase Oklahoma's manufacturing base, then my appologies, let's continue the discussion. However, I will readily admit I have not researched the topic to the extent where I could provide a full dissertation and am not prepared nor inclined to do so at this time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ASP785, post: 2084224, member: 12170"] I am struggling to understand the points you are trying to make. You are simply quoting exisiting programs back to me, programs in which I am aware of. If you are only looking at payroll withholdings, the 10% wouldn't make sense. More manufacturing jobs increases the revenue generated by municipalties from things like sales and property taxes and supports further economic activity in service related industries. Without all the data, it is tough to quantify the economic impact. When you stated ad valorem, I interpreted your post to mean an additional tax, hence why I thought you were suggesting a VAT. The government can and does create jobs regularly. Saying it doesn't is misguided. However, that really wasn't my point, so I would have phrased it differently. My point was along the lines of what you stated, in that governmen'ts roll should be to foster the environment of economic activity. If you are simply arguing for the sake of arguing, then this conversation will end here. I have nothing to prove over the internet. If you are wanting to dialogue on legitimate ideas to increase Oklahoma's manufacturing base, then my appologies, let's continue the discussion. However, I will readily admit I have not researched the topic to the extent where I could provide a full dissertation and am not prepared nor inclined to do so at this time. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lawmaker invites gun manufacturer to relocate to Sooner state
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom