Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3591611" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Yeah, we can win. It may not be a victory in court, but it will be a win on the battlefield for our rights. That's why we have arms - so we can win on a battlefield for our rights and freedoms.</p><p></p><p>Though they ban certain arms, they say we still have the right to keep and bear other arms. But, the problem is not that though we may keep and bear those other arms, the problem is that they have infringed upon the RKBA. An infringement, no matter how small, or seemingly insignificant, or for what ever "reason" given, is an infringement and a violation of the restriction placed upon government by the Second Added Article to the Constitution of the United States. </p><p></p><p>The only reason for government to restrict, ban, register, and/or confiscate our arms is to prevent We the People from defending ourselves against tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, fanaticism, autocracy, theocracy, Fascism, Marxism, socialism, communism, ochlocracy, oligarchy, slavery, and yes; even democracy.</p><p></p><p>We've heard it said that there is a compelling government interest in disarming the public. That is true. Reread the previous paragraph.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3591611, member: 745"] Yeah, we can win. It may not be a victory in court, but it will be a win on the battlefield for our rights. That's why we have arms - so we can win on a battlefield for our rights and freedoms. Though they ban certain arms, they say we still have the right to keep and bear other arms. But, the problem is not that though we may keep and bear those other arms, the problem is that they have infringed upon the RKBA. An infringement, no matter how small, or seemingly insignificant, or for what ever "reason" given, is an infringement and a violation of the restriction placed upon government by the Second Added Article to the Constitution of the United States. The only reason for government to restrict, ban, register, and/or confiscate our arms is to prevent We the People from defending ourselves against tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, fanaticism, autocracy, theocracy, Fascism, Marxism, socialism, communism, ochlocracy, oligarchy, slavery, and yes; even democracy. We've heard it said that there is a compelling government interest in disarming the public. That is true. Reread the previous paragraph. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
