Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4160864" data-attributes="member: 42584"><p>So exactly how much "compromising" have you been subjected to? All I've ever heard from .gov about taking away ANY of our firearm or 2A 'Rights' have been nothing more than just talk, talk, talk. Not counting STATE bans I've yet to see anything (except for the bump-stock ban) that has permanently affected any gun owners in at least the last 30-years.</p><p></p><p>My point here is that everyone is always bitchin' about the <strong>Federal </strong>government taking away their 2A Rights, which except for the bump-stock ban, has been actually little more than just constant talk and threats.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, while everyone is laser-focused on the Feds, the individual <strong>STATES </strong>are continuing about their business of chipping away your 2A Rights by putting restrictions on or outright bans on firearms, accessories, and ammo. </p><p></p><p>I've said it before and I'll say it again, <strong>it's the STATES that are screwing you</strong> and they are probably being guided by the Feds on how to do it. So while everyone continues to stay focused on the Federal government, the state governments are doing an end-run behind your backs to screw you in the azz.</p><p></p><p>Sure, Oklahoma has fairly lenient arms laws <strong>right now </strong>but if enough other states put in place firearm/accessory/ammo restrictions, then eventually even Oklahoma will have to bow to the pressure just like other states are already starting to do. If the Feds can't get you head-on, they will find alternate ways - bet on it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4160864, member: 42584"] So exactly how much "compromising" have you been subjected to? All I've ever heard from .gov about taking away ANY of our firearm or 2A 'Rights' have been nothing more than just talk, talk, talk. Not counting STATE bans I've yet to see anything (except for the bump-stock ban) that has permanently affected any gun owners in at least the last 30-years. My point here is that everyone is always bitchin' about the [B]Federal [/B]government taking away their 2A Rights, which except for the bump-stock ban, has been actually little more than just constant talk and threats. Meanwhile, while everyone is laser-focused on the Feds, the individual [B]STATES [/B]are continuing about their business of chipping away your 2A Rights by putting restrictions on or outright bans on firearms, accessories, and ammo. I've said it before and I'll say it again, [B]it's the STATES that are screwing you[/B] and they are probably being guided by the Feds on how to do it. So while everyone continues to stay focused on the Federal government, the state governments are doing an end-run behind your backs to screw you in the azz. Sure, Oklahoma has fairly lenient arms laws [B]right now [/B]but if enough other states put in place firearm/accessory/ammo restrictions, then eventually even Oklahoma will have to bow to the pressure just like other states are already starting to do. If the Feds can't get you head-on, they will find alternate ways - bet on it! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
