Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4161078" data-attributes="member: 42584"><p>The reason I said what I did was because of your comment;</p><p></p><p>"Oh, let's see now... How about the National Rifle Association agreeing to provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968... Need I say more?" </p><p></p><p>As if you believed that because the NRA agreed to the provisions . . . , that it means anything. Well it doesn't mean jack-squat whether they agreed with the Gun Control Act of 1968 or not because they have NO authority to submit Bills or pass any Laws. At best they can suck-up to politicians, maybe pass on a few 'gifts' in their bid to influence the politicians they own, but in the end it's still the politicians in the House, Senate, and ultimately Congress that submit the Bills and pass the Laws that affect our gun 'Rights'.</p><p></p><p>Again, the "restrictions" you are talking about were things passed into law more than 30-years ago (Gun Control Act of 1968). I know time seems to fly by really fast when you get old but, again, all the <strong>Federal </strong>bans or restrictions (except, again, for bump-stocks) happened a long time ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4161078, member: 42584"] The reason I said what I did was because of your comment; "Oh, let's see now... How about the National Rifle Association agreeing to provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968... Need I say more?" As if you believed that because the NRA agreed to the provisions . . . , that it means anything. Well it doesn't mean jack-squat whether they agreed with the Gun Control Act of 1968 or not because they have NO authority to submit Bills or pass any Laws. At best they can suck-up to politicians, maybe pass on a few 'gifts' in their bid to influence the politicians they own, but in the end it's still the politicians in the House, Senate, and ultimately Congress that submit the Bills and pass the Laws that affect our gun 'Rights'. Again, the "restrictions" you are talking about were things passed into law more than 30-years ago (Gun Control Act of 1968). I know time seems to fly by really fast when you get old but, again, all the [B]Federal [/B]bans or restrictions (except, again, for bump-stocks) happened a long time ago. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lawsuit against the atf.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom