Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Legality of shooting dog on your property?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="skatalite" data-source="post: 2107514" data-attributes="member: 6808"><p>I used the term dangerous to signify one's belief in "demon" dogs, or breeds that are demonized. It's a prejudice against specific breeds. I edited my post to make that clear, because you're right: Larger breeds, because of their strength, are more dangerous than smaller breeds.</p><p></p><p>Pit bulls are the demonized breed of today. Before that, it was dobermans and rottweilers. Before that, German shepherds. Blood hounds were even once demonized, along with malamutes. </p><p></p><p>Breeds are demonized because of, like you said, the people who seem to like them the most. But if a pit bull, or any dog, happened to wander onto my yard, I wouldn't automatically assume it's dangerous, and I definitely wouldn't shoot it just because.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All dogs have the potential to be a good guard dog, one that is a living door bell and a protector of her humans and home. But the reason big dogs are used is intimidation, not necessarily because it's more aggressive or dangerous. I've known many a big dog that are all bark and no bite.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="skatalite, post: 2107514, member: 6808"] I used the term dangerous to signify one's belief in "demon" dogs, or breeds that are demonized. It's a prejudice against specific breeds. I edited my post to make that clear, because you're right: Larger breeds, because of their strength, are more dangerous than smaller breeds. Pit bulls are the demonized breed of today. Before that, it was dobermans and rottweilers. Before that, German shepherds. Blood hounds were even once demonized, along with malamutes. Breeds are demonized because of, like you said, the people who seem to like them the most. But if a pit bull, or any dog, happened to wander onto my yard, I wouldn't automatically assume it's dangerous, and I definitely wouldn't shoot it just because. All dogs have the potential to be a good guard dog, one that is a living door bell and a protector of her humans and home. But the reason big dogs are used is intimidation, not necessarily because it's more aggressive or dangerous. I've known many a big dog that are all bark and no bite. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Legality of shooting dog on your property?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom