Just yesterday down by the State Capitol, I was pulled over for not completely stopping at a blinking red light. (I wont even try and argue because i actually dont remember it, I was talking with other occupants in the car about the helicopter and mediflights etc from the medical helicopter we had just passed). The trooper pulled in behind me with lights flashing. I pulled over , turned off car, rolled down window and put both hands on door so he could see them clearly. He ask for license and ins. I told him that i had my ccl license and that i was carrying... He asked me where is my DL and where is the firearm.. i explained that my dl and CCW permit were in my back left pocket and the weapon was on my right hip. He directed me to get my dl and CCW permit out only. I complied and always with a "Yes sir". At that time he told me to sit still and reached in the car window across my body to remove my weapon out of my holster and underneath my shirt. I asked him as he was tugging if i needed to slightly lean left to help him access it better.. he said no just sit still...so i did,,, he kept tugging and it wouldnt come out. He asked me if there was a thumbbreak or snap, I said no sir its an open top but its a tight fit.. .. after at least 30 seconds of tugging, he finally removed my G17 from the VM2. He then told me to step out of the car and go to the front seat of his car. Once i got in...he removed the magazine, racked the slide back and removed the round from the chamber ( i made sure to tell him that one was chambered when he removed magazine..) he then fiddled with it for just about 10 -15 seconds... he asked how long i have owned it, commenting that it looks like an older model,, i explained that yes, its a gen 2, but has never missed a beat. He commented that he didnt like a gun that doesnt have a hammer and that the 1911's spoiled him... he then called in to dispatch and ran the numbers on the gun. After that came back clear , he asked where i was going. After that brief conversation...he said that i did everything right and that sometimes people dont tell them right off the bat and they get a gun screwed into their ear... he then proceeded to write me a ticket,which im sure i deserve because i dont even remember which one of those street lights that were blinking...when we were all done in his front seat , he handed me my loaded magazine and one round... told me to put them in my pocket.. after i did he then handed me the g17 and told me not to load it until later,,, i thanked him and went on my way... , my only issue was the tugging to get the firearm out of my holster from across my body... i will of course always do what they say , but i sure was worried about his left hand reaching across my body and feeling around the handle of the loaded glock trying to figure out how to remove it.. he couldnt even see it . the shirt was covering it the entire time. I was having quick flashes of a hole being blown in my leg or as it he finally removed it, it going off towards the passenger..not to mention his own safety by reaching across a person he doesnt know and offering his entire arm.... i just didnt like the way that part was handled...but if that made him feel better,, then thats ok with me too...just made me very nervous....
While federal caselaw is clear about the officer being able to lawfully disarm someone during a traffic stop, I have extraordinary tactical concerns about doing something like this.
There are so many things that can go wrong when you reach inside someone's car.
And finally .....da,da,dum........I think we have finally found a violation of the SDA act by an LEO.
I would regard taking the gun AND running the serial number without some sort of additional probable cause as an "inspection" and there is nothing that grants an LEO this authority.
I run the serial number on guns fairly regularly but NOT in the case of taking a gun for the purposes of continuing a traffic stop for a TRAFFIC violaton. IF there is a title 21 violation, that is a different matter.
I've heard a lot of people flap their gums about being "illegally" disarmed and invariably I find that there is nothing unlawful about the officer's actions, but I believe this instance to be an exception UNLESS there is more to the story and the officer simply did not articulate the additional probable cause to the detainee.
However the "seizure" would be a 4th Amendment issue and really only subject to damages, which it appears that the detainee did not suffer.
Where this might be terribly relevent would be if the officer ND'd the gun while trying to remove it from the holster or while handling it and damaged property or injured the detainee or another passenger.
Michael Brown