Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Let’s talk riflescopes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ef9turbo" data-source="post: 3723089" data-attributes="member: 790"><p>I’m only basing my opinion off what I’ve shot. I’ve used this exact optic on a Bergara BMP 6.5 creed and comparing it to a JP AR10 that I had next to the Bergara running a NF ATACR 5-20, the PST had clearer glass. Hitting sub minute steel at 600 was extremely easy with both guns, both obviously could see and identify the targe(s) very easily. Quality wise, I’m sure NF is amazing but I can’t afford one and have been running Vortex because of the quality for price and their amazing warranty, so I can’t speak to how they handle being treated by me. My vortex’s have held up through a lot of abuse and I haven’t had any issues.</p><p></p><p>The PST gen 2 optics are such amazing optics for the price and do majority of what shooters need.</p><p></p><p>You need to figure out what you’re gonna use it for, how far you’re gonna shoot, what you want to spend, how they’re going to be treated, carried, etc. IMO, I use my rifles for certain things and they get banged up and I’ve never had any issues with them, but I also can’t justify buying a NF, especially now that I’ve shot so many of them, going in with such high expectations to really only be disappointed because they get hyped up so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ef9turbo, post: 3723089, member: 790"] I’m only basing my opinion off what I’ve shot. I’ve used this exact optic on a Bergara BMP 6.5 creed and comparing it to a JP AR10 that I had next to the Bergara running a NF ATACR 5-20, the PST had clearer glass. Hitting sub minute steel at 600 was extremely easy with both guns, both obviously could see and identify the targe(s) very easily. Quality wise, I’m sure NF is amazing but I can’t afford one and have been running Vortex because of the quality for price and their amazing warranty, so I can’t speak to how they handle being treated by me. My vortex’s have held up through a lot of abuse and I haven’t had any issues. The PST gen 2 optics are such amazing optics for the price and do majority of what shooters need. You need to figure out what you’re gonna use it for, how far you’re gonna shoot, what you want to spend, how they’re going to be treated, carried, etc. IMO, I use my rifles for certain things and they get banged up and I’ve never had any issues with them, but I also can’t justify buying a NF, especially now that I’ve shot so many of them, going in with such high expectations to really only be disappointed because they get hyped up so much. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Let’s talk riflescopes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom