Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Lets see all the rides!!!!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TANSTAAFL" data-source="post: 4265889" data-attributes="member: 27098"><p>I like the 3.5 Ecoboost, but now am really enamored with the 2.7 and 3.0 Ecoboosts,. The Early 2.7's had some issues with oil consumption, pan leaks and Carbon on the valves, but many have been resolved. The engine itself is designed for a lot of boost (built as robust as a diesel,) lots of low end torque and is easily tunned with a piggy back tuner so 515 ft/lbs of torque and 400 hp in a lightweight package are not unreasonable, all out of a 165 CID engine. The 2.3 is awesome as well, I have heard of 1200 HP ones, but as for streetability? Oh well, even in stock format that car is worthy of taking care of. I think they did have an independent rear suspension that year, or was that the Super Coupe?</p><p></p><p><strong>BTW, there are many kewl cars here, maybe okshooters.com should have a Cars and Coffee Event or at least choose a section of Remington Park during Cars and Coffee one day? </strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TANSTAAFL, post: 4265889, member: 27098"] I like the 3.5 Ecoboost, but now am really enamored with the 2.7 and 3.0 Ecoboosts,. The Early 2.7's had some issues with oil consumption, pan leaks and Carbon on the valves, but many have been resolved. The engine itself is designed for a lot of boost (built as robust as a diesel,) lots of low end torque and is easily tunned with a piggy back tuner so 515 ft/lbs of torque and 400 hp in a lightweight package are not unreasonable, all out of a 165 CID engine. The 2.3 is awesome as well, I have heard of 1200 HP ones, but as for streetability? Oh well, even in stock format that car is worthy of taking care of. I think they did have an independent rear suspension that year, or was that the Super Coupe? [B]BTW, there are many kewl cars here, maybe okshooters.com should have a Cars and Coffee Event or at least choose a section of Remington Park during Cars and Coffee one day? [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Lets see all the rides!!!!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
