Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Light Bulb Ban Creating Jobs...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nraman" data-source="post: 1316157" data-attributes="member: 10001"><p>He called it free market and free trade, the point is that he believed that if a foreign country "dumps" on us by subsidizing or other means, it was good for us. He never realized that "us" meant a few corporations temporarily increasing their profits, instead of "US" meaning the nation.</p><p>Don't get hung up on whether he said a specific word or not, that approach is not worthy of the conversation (he did support free market and free trade). What is important is that he advocated a government free approach where the corporations can do whatever the heck they want.</p><p>He was wrong, China will be the #2 economy in another couple of years and we are sliding. It does not work.</p><p>Domestic industry has to be protected from foreign products. The Chinese do it, the Japanese do it, the Indians do it and it works.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pl_FXt0eM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pl_FXt0eM</a></p><p>It is insanity to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nraman, post: 1316157, member: 10001"] He called it free market and free trade, the point is that he believed that if a foreign country "dumps" on us by subsidizing or other means, it was good for us. He never realized that "us" meant a few corporations temporarily increasing their profits, instead of "US" meaning the nation. Don't get hung up on whether he said a specific word or not, that approach is not worthy of the conversation (he did support free market and free trade). What is important is that he advocated a government free approach where the corporations can do whatever the heck they want. He was wrong, China will be the #2 economy in another couple of years and we are sliding. It does not work. Domestic industry has to be protected from foreign products. The Chinese do it, the Japanese do it, the Indians do it and it works. [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pl_FXt0eM"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0pl_FXt0eM[/URL] It is insanity to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting change. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Light Bulb Ban Creating Jobs...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom