Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Belthos" data-source="post: 2106931" data-attributes="member: 24944">There is no meaningful chance of passing a ban on rifles.There was never any real chance.The plan will be to over reach and then come to a compromise thereby painting their opponents as death mongers while showing their voting constituency that they fought the good fight.Expect a better than 50% chance that they will move to ban1) imports of military surplus weapons 2) detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds or possibly some compromise like 15 round max or some odd size like 27 that makes almost all current magazines unusable.an attempt to remove the Curio&#039;s and Relics&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;loophole&quot;.I&#039;m just waiting for them to add ammunition to the nfa, you&#039;ll still have a 30 round magazine but each bullet will require a separate $200 tax stamp and you&#039;d better have all your documents in order.&nbsp; If it cost you $6000 to load each and every magazine they&#039;d be comfortable allowing the type of people who can afford that to carry guns.&nbsp; None of the current proposals affected the rich and powerful in any case as their protection details were always exempt from both current and proposed rules.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Belthos, post: 2106931, member: 24944"] There is no meaningful chance of passing a ban on rifles. There was never any real chance. The plan will be to over reach and then come to a compromise thereby painting their opponents as death mongers while showing their voting constituency that they fought the good fight. Expect a better than 50% chance that they will move to ban 1) imports of military surplus weapons 2) detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds or possibly some compromise like 15 round max or some odd size like 27 that makes almost all current magazines unusable. an attempt to remove the Curio's and Relics "loophole". I'm just waiting for them to add ammunition to the nfa, you'll still have a 30 round magazine but each bullet will require a separate $200 tax stamp and you'd better have all your documents in order. If it cost you $6000 to load each and every magazine they'd be comfortable allowing the type of people who can afford that to carry guns. None of the current proposals affected the rich and powerful in any case as their protection details were always exempt from both current and proposed rules. [/QUOTE]

Verification