Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Low wind puts Texans on high alert to conserve power
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 3262988" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>There are other factors involved in that. It has been a loooong time since I took economic geography, but there were (and may still be) tax schemes in some states that tax companies on their proven reserves (I want to say the case study was mining, but it could've been oil&gas or coal) over the next X years. As a result, the companies would only have proven reserves for the next X years, then a year (or two) later, they would "discover" more of the resources to extend out to the next X years, but no further. They basically had no incentive to fully explore the deposits, and a pretty strong one to only explore enough of it to satisfy the tax man.</p><p></p><p>That, FWIW, was how I knew the predictions of "peak oil" were 99 and 44/100ths percent pure BS (well, that and understanding the concept of marginal wells). I didn't understand it at the time, but my Econ geography prof was right--the difference between natural resources and economic resources is that natural resources are finite.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 3262988, member: 26737"] There are other factors involved in that. It has been a loooong time since I took economic geography, but there were (and may still be) tax schemes in some states that tax companies on their proven reserves (I want to say the case study was mining, but it could've been oil&gas or coal) over the next X years. As a result, the companies would only have proven reserves for the next X years, then a year (or two) later, they would "discover" more of the resources to extend out to the next X years, but no further. They basically had no incentive to fully explore the deposits, and a pretty strong one to only explore enough of it to satisfy the tax man. That, FWIW, was how I knew the predictions of "peak oil" were 99 and 44/100ths percent pure BS (well, that and understanding the concept of marginal wells). I didn't understand it at the time, but my Econ geography prof was right--the difference between natural resources and economic resources is that natural resources are finite. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Low wind puts Texans on high alert to conserve power
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom