Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lumber not expensive enough?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Pablo" data-source="post: 3586682" data-attributes="member: 1563"><p>For the record trump wanted 24% in 2017 when he first imposed the tariff.</p><p></p><p>The commerce dept suggested doubling the 8 something percent it ended up being in a report released in late May.</p><p></p><p>I think Trump failed, and Biden will too if he doesn’t get rid of it, much less doubles it.</p><p></p><p>Unfair competition because most logging in Canada is done public lands and not private... whatever, not like they are china dumping steel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Pablo, post: 3586682, member: 1563"] For the record trump wanted 24% in 2017 when he first imposed the tariff. The commerce dept suggested doubling the 8 something percent it ended up being in a report released in late May. I think Trump failed, and Biden will too if he doesn’t get rid of it, much less doubles it. Unfair competition because most logging in Canada is done public lands and not private... whatever, not like they are china dumping steel. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lumber not expensive enough?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
