Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
M-1 Garand for apocalypse rifle?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Perplexed" data-source="post: 1999337" data-attributes="member: 7157"><p>What's the story behind that picture? How close did the hunter have to be to drop those grizzlies, assuming the Carbine is indeed what he used?</p><p></p><p>Here are a couple excerpts from "U.S. Infantry Weapons in Combat: Personal Experiences from World War II and Korea" where GI's, NCO's, and officers of the US Army were interviewed and asked what they thought about the weapons they used. The first excerpt is from the story was told by John "Red" Lawrence, a Marine Corps GI who saw action in the Marshall Islands in 1943, then at Guam and Okinawa:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this excerpt is from the story told by John Shirley, a US Army NCO with the 3rd Division in Anzio, then in southern France during Operation Dragoon:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There are more stories like these in this book and in other books as well, along with the stories, fewer as they were, of the GI's who preferred the Carbine, usually because of its lighter weight. Bottom line, you can argue for the M1 Carbine all you want, but I'll rather go with the experiences of USGI's during two wars and use the M1 Garand instead - if I <em>really</em> had to depend on one of those two weapons in a SHTF scenario.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Perplexed, post: 1999337, member: 7157"] What's the story behind that picture? How close did the hunter have to be to drop those grizzlies, assuming the Carbine is indeed what he used? Here are a couple excerpts from "U.S. Infantry Weapons in Combat: Personal Experiences from World War II and Korea" where GI's, NCO's, and officers of the US Army were interviewed and asked what they thought about the weapons they used. The first excerpt is from the story was told by John "Red" Lawrence, a Marine Corps GI who saw action in the Marshall Islands in 1943, then at Guam and Okinawa: And this excerpt is from the story told by John Shirley, a US Army NCO with the 3rd Division in Anzio, then in southern France during Operation Dragoon: There are more stories like these in this book and in other books as well, along with the stories, fewer as they were, of the GI's who preferred the Carbine, usually because of its lighter weight. Bottom line, you can argue for the M1 Carbine all you want, but I'll rather go with the experiences of USGI's during two wars and use the M1 Garand instead - if I [I]really[/I] had to depend on one of those two weapons in a SHTF scenario. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
M-1 Garand for apocalypse rifle?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom