Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="milsurp2.0" data-source="post: 1999362" data-attributes="member: 24497">It was designed to replace a pistol. Comparing it to a Garand is like comparing apples and oranges. I simply stated I prefer it over the Garand. At under 200 yards it will drop a person. In a SHTF situation I&#039;m not going to shoot until I see the whites of eyes. I dont have the ammo so I want to make every shot count. With a 15 round mag and two more on the stock I can let &#039;em get close. I dont know about the pic. its from up in Alaska. Maybe it was a guide gun<img src="/images/smilies/wink2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink2&nbsp; &nbsp; :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" />. Heres an interesting link to an experiment involving the .30 carbine. Wish they had done it at a farther distance. Still did better than an AR.<a href="http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot8.htm" target="_blank">http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot8.htm</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="milsurp2.0, post: 1999362, member: 24497"] It was designed to replace a pistol. Comparing it to a Garand is like comparing apples and oranges. I simply stated I prefer it over the Garand. At under 200 yards it will drop a person. In a SHTF situation I'm not going to shoot until I see the whites of eyes. I dont have the ammo so I want to make every shot count. With a 15 round mag and two more on the stock I can let 'em get close. I dont know about the pic. its from up in Alaska. Maybe it was a guide gun:wink2:. Heres an interesting link to an experiment involving the .30 carbine. Wish they had done it at a farther distance. Still did better than an AR. [url]http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot8.htm[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification