M1 Garand goes boom

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

milsurp2.0

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
1,560
Reaction score
36
Location
Pawhuska
Figured I would post this since so many seem to gravitate toward the Garand on here and it was kind of hidden on SRF. You have to be a member to see pics I think so I'll lift them and copy and paste the post. Heres the link: http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=53&p=1002378#p1002378

Had a bad experience a week ago. Went to the range to test fire some handloads through a Springfield M1 and ultimately it blew up.

Details: Rifle - M1 Garand, Springfield manufacture receiver (1942) rebarreled in1947.
Ammo: 3-rounds. Reloaded - full-length sized once fired Federal brass, 163 grain mechanically pulled surplus bullet, Winchester Large Rifle primers, 46.5 grains of IMR4895 powder. Powder was dispensed/weighed using RCBS Chargemaster system calibrated immediately before use. Brass was checked for OA length and was within specs. prior to loading. Bullets were seated to crimping groove but not crimped.

Three rounds loaded into enbloc and loaded into rifle. Rifle hand charged with first round. Rifle fired and bullet strike noted in berm, ejected brass landed approx. 10' to front and approx. 20 degrees from line of sight. Second round cycled into chamber. Second round fired with similar observations to first round. Third round fired and rifle disintegrated through magazine well area. After checking hands and face determined injuries and patched them up then retrieved rifle pieces and drove to emergency room for treatment of bruises, lacerations and burns to left wrist.

Later analysis of rifle indicates bolt face fracture and case head failure. Lower front of bolt face sheared off around ejector hole causing passageway for hot gases and fragments to enter magazine well area and blow out stock and triggerguard floorplate. Receiver held and bolt frozen in place. Bolt has been removed and shows fracturing of both locking lugs as well as longitudinal fracture back from ejector hole. Extractor has backed out. Last round/fractured brass still stuck in chamber.

No bore obstruction noted - bore is clear and barrel shows no sign of bulging. Gas system appears fully intact. Failure appears to have occurred before bullet left muzzle as gas system appears to not have been activated.

Any constructive observations or opinions would be appreciated. I have been reloading for over 50 years and never had this type of failure. One fired brass recovered and shows signs of slight pressure but not excessive. Primer is slightly cupped into firing pin hole but not flattened. No indications on brass of stretching or splitting.
 

Attachments

  • 1517699_462593037179283_1047273192_n.jpg
    1517699_462593037179283_1047273192_n.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 277
  • 1503925_462593067179280_1535951995_n.jpg
    1503925_462593067179280_1535951995_n.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 264
  • 1517400_462541710517749_1992724775_n.jpg
    1517400_462541710517749_1992724775_n.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 375
  • 1536643_465107653594488_377984492_n.jpg
    1536643_465107653594488_377984492_n.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 264

aviator41

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
5,004
Reaction score
115
Location
Edmond/Guthrie
Bigger photos would be good.

I am sure you already know this, but you're at least 1gr over hodgdon stated max for IMR4895 for a 165gr bullet. (no data fora 163)

were these workup loads for this rifle or has it previously demonstrated the ability to handle such a hot round?

Not sure I would ever use a max load in a rifle of this age, but thats me.
 

milsurp2.0

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
1,560
Reaction score
36
Location
Pawhuska
Bigger photos would be good.

I am sure you already know this, but you're at least 1gr over hodgdon stated max for IMR4895 for a 165gr bullet. (no data fora 163)

were these workup loads for this rifle or has it previously demonstrated the ability to handle such a hot round?

Not sure I would ever use a max load in a rifle of this age, but thats me.

Wasnt me. Just thought it might be of interest. I would bet the bullets not being crimped and the heavy charge ruined his day.
 

oneof79

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
1,435
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
Bigger photos would be good.

I am sure you already know this, but you're at least 1gr over hodgdon stated max for IMR4895 for a 165gr bullet. (no data fora 163)

were these workup loads for this rifle or has it previously demonstrated the ability to handle such a hot round?

Not sure I would ever use a max load in a rifle of this age, but thats me.


My Sierra book shows a max load of imr4895 with a 165 gr bullet as 46.8. Then shows 49 grains for the 168 gr match king. That seems kind of backwards to me. My interest in this is I use 46.5 grains of imr4895 with a 168 grain Sierra Matchking and consider it a little on the light side out of my Garand.
 

Sanford

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
3,702
Reaction score
298
Location
40 Miles S. of Nowhere, OK.
Well, here's what I see at Hodgdon's database:

Capture.jpg

Lee shows Starting 49.0gr, 2768fps, Max 52.0gr, 2888fps 57,200 PSI for a 165gr (at 3.3 OAL) (same as Hodgdon)

Lyman shows Starting 45.0gr, 2503bps, Max 50.0gr, 2815fps, 56,200 PSI for a 165gr (at 3.285 OAL)

Clark's NRA article from years ago did recommend 46.5 to 47.5 (2637 - 2676 fps) for a 168gr (at 3.34 OAL) as a safe load for the Garand.
 

Sanford

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
3,702
Reaction score
298
Location
40 Miles S. of Nowhere, OK.
My Sierra book shows a max load of imr4895 with a 165 gr bullet as 46.8. Then shows 49 grains for the 168 gr match king. That seems kind of backwards to me. My interest in this is I use 46.5 grains of imr4895 with a 168 grain Sierra Matchking and consider it a little on the light side out of my Garand.
Does your Sierra data show the same OAL for both of those loads?
 

ASP785

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
1,622
Reaction score
4
Location
Collinsville
OP thanks for posting this. It's pretty common knowledge that new manufactured commercial ammunition can break the op rod on these guns so why this guy tried a max charge is beyond me. I have to agree that bullet setback is probably the culprit here.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom