Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Perplexed" data-source="post: 2453362" data-attributes="member: 7157">Indeed I did - those 60&#039;s barrels have a reputation for being the most accurate of all the USGI barrels, so I&#039;m pleased about that even if they&#039;re not as &quot;sexy&quot; as getting an original barrel or a WRA barrel.&nbsp; The unmarked barrel is a neat bit of history, for sure!Ha. I might be selling one of these, but I&#039;m not sure yet <img src="/images/smilies/wink2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink2&nbsp; &nbsp; :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" />Thanks - it&#039;s not much of a painted rack number left, but the Dymo label is a first for me. Did you go straight to the pictures? <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" data-shortname=":D" />&nbsp;&nbsp; It took approximately 120 days from send to receive, and my order number was 494150.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Perplexed, post: 2453362, member: 7157"] Indeed I did - those 60's barrels have a reputation for being the most accurate of all the USGI barrels, so I'm pleased about that even if they're not as "sexy" as getting an original barrel or a WRA barrel. The unmarked barrel is a neat bit of history, for sure! Ha. I might be selling one of these, but I'm not sure yet :wink2: Thanks - it's not much of a painted rack number left, but the Dymo label is a first for me. Did you go straight to the pictures? :D It took approximately 120 days from send to receive, and my order number was 494150. [/QUOTE]

Verification