Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
M4: Colt vs. BCM
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aestus" data-source="post: 1834466" data-attributes="member: 2989"><p>Cost and also it's not "mil-spec." Remember, mil-spec doesn't always mean it's better. Nickle-boron / Fail zero type coatings aren't "mil-spec" but they are superior to just having "mil-spec" coatings on your BCG and chamber. I would argue that mid-length gas systems aren't mil-spec either, but I'm pretty sure most people who know anything about AR's or builds AR's is going to argue with how much more reliable & smoother operating a midlength will make a 16" upper run.</p><p></p><p>The only thing Nitrided barrels have over Chrome barrels is that Nitriding is much thinner and even. It makes your rifle much more "accurate." The chrome plating is thicker and it's hard to apply it so it's even all the way down the bore. Also, the bore is cut slightly bigger to accommodate the chrome. How much more accurate Nitrided barrels are compared to chrome barrels vs the cost is arguable. </p><p></p><p>I'm ok with either. Only time I would want Nitrided is if I'm going for a dedicated long range AR using a scope and don't want a stainless barrel. However, it just so happens that both of my main AR's (Loki and LWRC) both have Nitrided barrels and both are insanely accurate <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aestus, post: 1834466, member: 2989"] Cost and also it's not "mil-spec." Remember, mil-spec doesn't always mean it's better. Nickle-boron / Fail zero type coatings aren't "mil-spec" but they are superior to just having "mil-spec" coatings on your BCG and chamber. I would argue that mid-length gas systems aren't mil-spec either, but I'm pretty sure most people who know anything about AR's or builds AR's is going to argue with how much more reliable & smoother operating a midlength will make a 16" upper run. The only thing Nitrided barrels have over Chrome barrels is that Nitriding is much thinner and even. It makes your rifle much more "accurate." The chrome plating is thicker and it's hard to apply it so it's even all the way down the bore. Also, the bore is cut slightly bigger to accommodate the chrome. How much more accurate Nitrided barrels are compared to chrome barrels vs the cost is arguable. I'm ok with either. Only time I would want Nitrided is if I'm going for a dedicated long range AR using a scope and don't want a stainless barrel. However, it just so happens that both of my main AR's (Loki and LWRC) both have Nitrided barrels and both are insanely accurate :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
M4: Colt vs. BCM
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom