Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Seadog" data-source="post: 4093887" data-attributes="member: 9018">Sure I’m against illegal, alien anchor babies. When we look at the 13th, 14th, 15th amendments, the reconstruction amendments act. They served as very special and precise protections for freed slaves that were not considered human or considered as citizens. They went into affect because Democrats were still trying to put the blacks back into indentured servitude and oppress them.  It’s kind of funny how this has been *******ized by the Democrats and the left in this time period to mean any illegal can come across our borders, squat, and pop out a baby rewarding it with citizenship and the parent or parents with American taxpayer money to take care of it. Amendment 13 section 1 was wrote specifically for freed blacks and their offspring. It was not intended for people in the future coming here illegally. I don’t know of any law that rewards anybody for breaking it, except for Democrats in this one *******ized amendment.  13 amendment section 1All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and (“subject to the jurisdiction thereof”), are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.Granted, this isn’t all of it, just the pertinent opening part. Where does it say illegal criminal aliens pushing out babies, breaking the law become citizens? This part of the amendment has been *******ized and abuse so much that people take it for what democrats say. That it gives citizenship to an illegal aliens baby. They are not citizens so they are not afforded those rights of citizenship, yet the liberal progressive government has been claiming this for a long time and no one has wanted to challenge it. Part of the subject.. If this was for everyone all around the world then why did the government explicitly exclude the Indians until the 1930s? Why did the government exclude a few foreign ambassadors that had children while residing in the United States? Why exclude these few minute categories, but leave it wide open to everybody else in the entire world? Because they didn’t. A big lie pushed by Democrats for the longest damn time. Oh, they’re just children, think of the children, the poor children. All heart strings, sympathy and BS over something that’s never been, yet has been accepted because the government has had the power, but never the authority. That’s why we’re in this boondoggle. So if you’re saying, you want clarification, that illegals and their anchor babies aren’t citizens? Sure I’d be cool with that.  If we could get this passed Democrats would be almost as mad as when Republicans freed and took their slaves away.</blockquote>

Verification