Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Seadog" data-source="post: 4093930" data-attributes="member: 9018">OK, I’ll play your game. Atomic or nuclear bombs? They have never been a privately owned item. These nation killers have been commissioned, and  made explicitly for the government by the government. Can’t say there’s been a time that I’ve known anyone except for Uncle Sam or communist regimes in possession of them. They are an interesting deterrent.  Do I think anyone person should have an atomic bomb that has a kill radius of 20-100 miles x2 with the fallout in miles or more? Not liking the idea.  John podesta? A man in charge of billions of dollars in money laundering and BS, green energy? Not a fan. He should already be in jail like along with Fauci. Automatic weapons? Why that? Americans can still go out and buy automatic weapons. They’re just expensive as all get out and take about a year to take possession of.  So technically they’re not illegal. You just have to be rich. Should it be just for an exclusive rich club? I don’t think so. It be nice to able to buy modern full autos other than old antiques. I don’t care who has them as long as they’re not being used in the commission of a crime. The government has the power, not the authority to limit what people have. The second amendments last sentence clearly says shall not be infringed. The first 10 amendments are not restrictions on the people, it is limitations and restrictions on the government. The 2A says “shall”, that is a command word. It doesn’t say “should” which is a suggestion or recommendation. The government shall not infringe. Yet it does.</blockquote>

Verification