Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Found Not Guilty for Shooting 3 Cops During No-Knock Raid Read
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2995963" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I can't come up with anything in the Constitution that would explicitly forbid them, and--as noted above--I can see (very rare) instances where they're warranted (no pun intended). A much better argument would be an excessive force claim, but that's based in statute, not the Constitution.</p><p></p><p>What would help is for the officers to exercise common sense in their warrant requests, and judges to exercise meaningful oversight--including asking hard questions--when they grant warrants. Also, even if they're permissible under SCOTUS precedent, state constitutions and statutes can be more restrictive (though they wouldn't be binding on federal agents, just state/county/local). See <a href="http://law.okcu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/OCULREV-Spring-2012-Bolick-1-15-7-24-121.pdf" target="_blank">http://law.okcu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/OCULREV-Spring-2012-Bolick-1-15-7-24-121.pdf</a> for an excellent explanation of the "one-way ratchet;" I had the opportunity to sit in on that lecture while I was in law school.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2995963, member: 13624"] I can't come up with anything in the Constitution that would explicitly forbid them, and--as noted above--I can see (very rare) instances where they're warranted (no pun intended). A much better argument would be an excessive force claim, but that's based in statute, not the Constitution. What would help is for the officers to exercise common sense in their warrant requests, and judges to exercise meaningful oversight--including asking hard questions--when they grant warrants. Also, even if they're permissible under SCOTUS precedent, state constitutions and statutes can be more restrictive (though they wouldn't be binding on federal agents, just state/county/local). See [URL]http://law.okcu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/OCULREV-Spring-2012-Bolick-1-15-7-24-121.pdf[/URL] for an excellent explanation of the "one-way ratchet;" I had the opportunity to sit in on that lecture while I was in law school. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Found Not Guilty for Shooting 3 Cops During No-Knock Raid Read
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom