Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Found Not Guilty for Shooting 3 Cops During No-Knock Raid Read
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokinfun" data-source="post: 2996096" data-attributes="member: 28113"><p>I have never been around a flash bang, but after having an IED go off near me, it takes a few seconds to get your senses lined back up.</p><p>I can see a need for no-knock warrants, but their needs to be extra ordinary judicial oversight when they are issued.</p><p>I would think there should be some requirements such as: police can 100 percent can say the person is in the house, there is no way to wait for the guy to walk outside, the is danger increases to everyone if you wait, their is an immediate danger to someone else, and there is no danger to anyone else in the home.</p><p>I do not think that destroying evidence is a reason use a no-knock type warrant.</p><p>I can see a known dangerous criminal, who is normally armed in public, and there is a reason to believe he will "fight it out" if arrested in public, that waiting until he is asleep in bed to bust in his house and arresting him could be a better option.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokinfun, post: 2996096, member: 28113"] I have never been around a flash bang, but after having an IED go off near me, it takes a few seconds to get your senses lined back up. I can see a need for no-knock warrants, but their needs to be extra ordinary judicial oversight when they are issued. I would think there should be some requirements such as: police can 100 percent can say the person is in the house, there is no way to wait for the guy to walk outside, the is danger increases to everyone if you wait, their is an immediate danger to someone else, and there is no danger to anyone else in the home. I do not think that destroying evidence is a reason use a no-knock type warrant. I can see a known dangerous criminal, who is normally armed in public, and there is a reason to believe he will "fight it out" if arrested in public, that waiting until he is asleep in bed to bust in his house and arresting him could be a better option. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Found Not Guilty for Shooting 3 Cops During No-Knock Raid Read
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom