Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandate that ALL Private Sellers who sel over 50 guns a year should be FFLs Means...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2831012" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p><strong>Suppose the Feds mandate that all private sellers who sell over 50 guns a year MUST be FFLs. </strong></p><p><u>Minor Issue:</u></p><p><u></u>They are now <strong>legislating intra state commerce, which is unconstitutional. </strong>Their argument will be that guns are made across state lines and hence they can enforce it, which is hoaky because by that measure, there is no such thing as intra-state commerce. </p><p></p><p><u>Major Issue:</u></p><p><u></u><strong>How would they know if a private party person has sold over 50 guns a year, without knowing that sales had actually taken place?</strong>. So, they have to know that the sale took place. To know that the sale took place between private parties requires them to know who owned the firearm before the sale and who owns it after. This is <strong>registration</strong>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2831012, member: 3553"] [B]Suppose the Feds mandate that all private sellers who sell over 50 guns a year MUST be FFLs. [/B] [U]Minor Issue: [/U]They are now [B]legislating intra state commerce, which is unconstitutional. [/B]Their argument will be that guns are made across state lines and hence they can enforce it, which is hoaky because by that measure, there is no such thing as intra-state commerce. [U]Major Issue: [/U][B]How would they know if a private party person has sold over 50 guns a year, without knowing that sales had actually taken place?[/B]. So, they have to know that the sale took place. To know that the sale took place between private parties requires them to know who owned the firearm before the sale and who owns it after. This is [B]registration[/B]. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandate that ALL Private Sellers who sel over 50 guns a year should be FFLs Means...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom