Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandate that ALL Private Sellers who sel over 50 guns a year should be FFLs Means...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2831163" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>I see what you are saying. I think the difference between the current state of affairs and a possible future, is that <strong>right now there is no requirement that ALL private sales in a state do something</strong> (whatever that something is). Right now there are no federal requirements at all governing private sales between parties in a state. If someone breaks the law egregiously and pretends to be a private seller when they are obviously running a business, they can be prosecuted. But the burden is on the feds and they look for egregious violations in the aggregate (like the example you gave of someone setting up fresh guns at every show every weekend). </p><p> </p><p>If there is a federal requirement that <strong>requires ALL private sales within a state to do something, </strong>whatever that something may be, then the feds are going to want to <strong>keep tabs on ALL private sales</strong>, not just look for egregious and obvious violations in the aggregate. </p><p></p><p>To do that, would need registration because <strong>the feds would need some way to monitor all sales, and the only way to do that is to know who owns what before and after every transaction. </strong></p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2831163, member: 3553"] I see what you are saying. I think the difference between the current state of affairs and a possible future, is that [B]right now there is no requirement that ALL private sales in a state do something[/B] (whatever that something is). Right now there are no federal requirements at all governing private sales between parties in a state. If someone breaks the law egregiously and pretends to be a private seller when they are obviously running a business, they can be prosecuted. But the burden is on the feds and they look for egregious violations in the aggregate (like the example you gave of someone setting up fresh guns at every show every weekend). If there is a federal requirement that [B]requires ALL private sales within a state to do something, [/B]whatever that something may be, then the feds are going to want to [B]keep tabs on ALL private sales[/B], not just look for egregious and obvious violations in the aggregate. To do that, would need registration because [B]the feds would need some way to monitor all sales, and the only way to do that is to know who owns what before and after every transaction. [/B] :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandate that ALL Private Sellers who sel over 50 guns a year should be FFLs Means...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom