Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandatory liability insurance for gun owners?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="n2sooners" data-source="post: 2114004" data-attributes="member: 26539"><p>Never thought about the backdoor registration this could bring about. The biggest problem I see with the gun grabber plans is the fact they have no legal authority to force you to buy auto insurance for cars that will remain on your property, so they would have no authority to force you to buy insurance to keep guns there either. And as you mentioned, incidents involving those with a CCW are so low that the premium just covering carrying would be next to nothing. I think what they really want to force is insurance on guns which are stolen and then used to commit a crime, but insurance like that doesn't exist and insurance companies would never cover stolen items. If your car is stolen insurance only covers damage to your car, not damage it causes. They want to force people to buy something that doesn't exist.</p><p></p><p>But maybe that's the plan. The government legislates you buy something that doesn't exist, and since it doesn't exist they then create it. Then you have to buy your insurance through a government agency (which gets to set the price) and in the process your guns are then registered with them.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Good article BTW</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="n2sooners, post: 2114004, member: 26539"] Never thought about the backdoor registration this could bring about. The biggest problem I see with the gun grabber plans is the fact they have no legal authority to force you to buy auto insurance for cars that will remain on your property, so they would have no authority to force you to buy insurance to keep guns there either. And as you mentioned, incidents involving those with a CCW are so low that the premium just covering carrying would be next to nothing. I think what they really want to force is insurance on guns which are stolen and then used to commit a crime, but insurance like that doesn't exist and insurance companies would never cover stolen items. If your car is stolen insurance only covers damage to your car, not damage it causes. They want to force people to buy something that doesn't exist. But maybe that's the plan. The government legislates you buy something that doesn't exist, and since it doesn't exist they then create it. Then you have to buy your insurance through a government agency (which gets to set the price) and in the process your guns are then registered with them. Edit: Good article BTW [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mandatory liability insurance for gun owners?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom