Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Marijuana Disqualification Question To Be Removed From ATF 4473
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3553601" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>I never said SCOTUS would hear the case. I said they never would and posted a historical time line of 10 years easily looked up.</p><p>My statement about local FFL's is not hypothetical. It's the law they have to abide by. </p><p>Once again, your arguing an opinion that does not have case law for backup in a court. </p><p>Your arguing states law vs Federal law which we all know the feds can bully the states into submissions as they historically have. </p><p>The Constitution gives the states great rights in it's original intent but has learned how to get around the rights by being a bully. Withholding funds is their leverage. When the feds said drinking laws must be 21 while a lot of states said if your old enough to join the military, 18 is good, the feds withheld highway and infrastructure funds to bully the states into compliance. </p><p>I don't want to get away from the original content of this thread as I think its really important, but wanted to show how the government can force legislation the states don't want as an example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3553601, member: 5412"] I never said SCOTUS would hear the case. I said they never would and posted a historical time line of 10 years easily looked up. My statement about local FFL's is not hypothetical. It's the law they have to abide by. Once again, your arguing an opinion that does not have case law for backup in a court. Your arguing states law vs Federal law which we all know the feds can bully the states into submissions as they historically have. The Constitution gives the states great rights in it's original intent but has learned how to get around the rights by being a bully. Withholding funds is their leverage. When the feds said drinking laws must be 21 while a lot of states said if your old enough to join the military, 18 is good, the feds withheld highway and infrastructure funds to bully the states into compliance. I don't want to get away from the original content of this thread as I think its really important, but wanted to show how the government can force legislation the states don't want as an example. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Marijuana Disqualification Question To Be Removed From ATF 4473
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom