Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Marines order Colt .45s
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WTJ" data-source="post: 1859225" data-attributes="member: 6661"><p>Uhhhh, no, it is not, particularly when both weapons are loaded with GC compliant ball ammunition. You must be in the big platform/small projectile camp? Less recoil doesn't hurted my paw?</p><p></p><p>All of the problems you cited are fixed in newer 1911's if you spec them right. Colt even makes a LW XSE Rail if the full steel is just too heavy. Furthermore a double-stack .45ACP is not appreciably larger in the grip than the M9 if capacity is a big issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WTJ, post: 1859225, member: 6661"] Uhhhh, no, it is not, particularly when both weapons are loaded with GC compliant ball ammunition. You must be in the big platform/small projectile camp? Less recoil doesn't hurted my paw? All of the problems you cited are fixed in newer 1911's if you spec them right. Colt even makes a LW XSE Rail if the full steel is just too heavy. Furthermore a double-stack .45ACP is not appreciably larger in the grip than the M9 if capacity is a big issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Marines order Colt .45s
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom