Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
McCarthy's fascist gun ban bill now has 65 sponsors!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 1452008" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>The ar15 rifle is manufactured to accept a 30 round mag as standard. So is the uzi and all 9mm carbines that take uzi mags. </p><p>Are you Ok with those?</p><p></p><p>To answer your broader question, yes there is a legitimate need. In a defense situation. Unless you would like to face 4-5 armed intruders who clearly don't give a flip about the law and are armed with all sorts of illegal weapons, with your 10 round magazine (your calling it a clip clearly indicates your lack of familiarity with firearms). </p><p></p><p>Or even facing one dude with 3 guns on him (with 10 round mags each) with your little 10 round mag pistol. </p><p></p><p>Banning hi cap magazines is the prelude to banning all sorts of weapons for which there is "no legitimate need". After all, why is there a "legitimate need" for semi autos in general? Animals can't shoot so why not just allow bolt actions and lever actions and revolvers?</p><p></p><p>And while you are at it, why not just ban big vehicles...no legitimate need for most of us to drive big gas guzzlers that can kill....only people with a "legitimate need" like construction workers or farmers whould be allowed these large SUVs...the rest of us should be "issued" small smart cars with rubber bumpers that are pedestrian friendly. </p><p></p><p>Ahh what a utopian world that would be. </p><p>A liberal's dream come true. Right before all "hate speech" is censored and "angry emotions" are detected and removed with copious doses of soma. Ahh...brave new world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 1452008, member: 3553"] The ar15 rifle is manufactured to accept a 30 round mag as standard. So is the uzi and all 9mm carbines that take uzi mags. Are you Ok with those? To answer your broader question, yes there is a legitimate need. In a defense situation. Unless you would like to face 4-5 armed intruders who clearly don't give a flip about the law and are armed with all sorts of illegal weapons, with your 10 round magazine (your calling it a clip clearly indicates your lack of familiarity with firearms). Or even facing one dude with 3 guns on him (with 10 round mags each) with your little 10 round mag pistol. Banning hi cap magazines is the prelude to banning all sorts of weapons for which there is "no legitimate need". After all, why is there a "legitimate need" for semi autos in general? Animals can't shoot so why not just allow bolt actions and lever actions and revolvers? And while you are at it, why not just ban big vehicles...no legitimate need for most of us to drive big gas guzzlers that can kill....only people with a "legitimate need" like construction workers or farmers whould be allowed these large SUVs...the rest of us should be "issued" small smart cars with rubber bumpers that are pedestrian friendly. Ahh what a utopian world that would be. A liberal's dream come true. Right before all "hate speech" is censored and "angry emotions" are detected and removed with copious doses of soma. Ahh...brave new world. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
McCarthy's fascist gun ban bill now has 65 sponsors!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom