Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
McCarthy's fascist gun ban bill now has 65 sponsors!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greenbeetle" data-source="post: 1479585" data-attributes="member: 17057"><p>Good question. It sounds like the arguement is that bad guys have less firepower? They are saying the shooter in Arizona, for example, was taken down when he went to reload. No source on that so I can't verify.</p><p></p><p>Then again if they have bad intentions they will get whatever type of weapon without whatever magazine they want. </p><p></p><p>So, I don't know how it would save lives.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did the framers envision civilians owning automatic and semi-automatic weapons? And owning more than a few each? Bearing a gun that took 60 seconds to reload and could barely hit the broadside of a barn at 50 yards is different than owning a modern firearm isn't it, at least a little? There is this religious-like fanaticism that the constitution is infallable. It was made with provisions to allow it's ammending because they knew it was not perfect and that things change. </p><p></p><p>I wonder what the framers would say about 30 round magazines. Or a better question, what would they do to limit gun violence?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greenbeetle, post: 1479585, member: 17057"] Good question. It sounds like the arguement is that bad guys have less firepower? They are saying the shooter in Arizona, for example, was taken down when he went to reload. No source on that so I can't verify. Then again if they have bad intentions they will get whatever type of weapon without whatever magazine they want. So, I don't know how it would save lives. Did the framers envision civilians owning automatic and semi-automatic weapons? And owning more than a few each? Bearing a gun that took 60 seconds to reload and could barely hit the broadside of a barn at 50 yards is different than owning a modern firearm isn't it, at least a little? There is this religious-like fanaticism that the constitution is infallable. It was made with provisions to allow it's ammending because they knew it was not perfect and that things change. I wonder what the framers would say about 30 round magazines. Or a better question, what would they do to limit gun violence? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
McCarthy's fascist gun ban bill now has 65 sponsors!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom