Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MaddSkillz" data-source="post: 1479970" data-attributes="member: 1159">The intent of the 2nd Amendment is protect us from tyranny in government.&nbsp; That is the driving force behind its creation.&nbsp; Knowing this, why would the framers then want and allow a government to regulate what kind of arms we could have while the government gets what they want?Sounds like bringing a knife to a gunfight if you ask me and that certainly isn&#039;t want the framers envisioned. &quot;Shall not be infringed&quot; is a pretty simple phrase to understand unless you&#039;re part of the SCOTUS.&nbsp; Then somehow is becomes extremely complicated.&nbsp; Like something scratched onto the surface of four-thousand year old stone tablet. &quot;We just can&#039;t make any sense of it!!!&quot;&nbsp; <img src="/images/smilies/image096.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":hithead:" title="Image096&nbsp; &nbsp; :hithead:" data-shortname=":hithead:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="MaddSkillz, post: 1479970, member: 1159"] The intent of the 2nd Amendment is protect us from tyranny in government. That is the driving force behind its creation. Knowing this, why would the framers then want and allow a government to regulate what kind of arms we could have while the government gets what they want? Sounds like bringing a knife to a gunfight if you ask me and that certainly isn't want the framers envisioned. "Shall not be infringed" is a pretty simple phrase to understand unless you're part of the SCOTUS. Then somehow is becomes extremely complicated. Like something scratched onto the surface of four-thousand year old stone tablet. "We just can't make any sense of it!!!" :hithead: [/QUOTE]

Verification