Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Michigan pushes right-to-work measure(24th state in the nation to adopt R-T-W)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TedKennedy" data-source="post: 2013669" data-attributes="member: 25419"><p>When the union started to come into our plant in '94, the company started a misinformation campaign like none other. When that wasn't working, they started threatening employees. We got the union anyway, and life was seriously better. I only have that experience to draw from, but I can say without hesitation, that it's better to be able to address your boss with a problem having a written set of rules you BOTH have to follow, than to have production floor dictators. I have yet to understand how a CEO can get a huge bonus as the company claims they have to lay off workers, and it's the unions fault. Who was the CEO that signed the contract? If he agreed to terms that would financially hurt the company why isn't HE accaountable, not just the union?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TedKennedy, post: 2013669, member: 25419"] When the union started to come into our plant in '94, the company started a misinformation campaign like none other. When that wasn't working, they started threatening employees. We got the union anyway, and life was seriously better. I only have that experience to draw from, but I can say without hesitation, that it's better to be able to address your boss with a problem having a written set of rules you BOTH have to follow, than to have production floor dictators. I have yet to understand how a CEO can get a huge bonus as the company claims they have to lay off workers, and it's the unions fault. Who was the CEO that signed the contract? If he agreed to terms that would financially hurt the company why isn't HE accaountable, not just the union? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Michigan pushes right-to-work measure(24th state in the nation to adopt R-T-W)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
