Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Michigan pushes right-to-work measure(24th state in the nation to adopt R-T-W)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="twoguns?" data-source="post: 2014500" data-attributes="member: 7012"><p>I agree , the force of law is to make the ceo's negotiate on the same level as the unions, the many speak better than just a few .</p><p>And those wages , by necessity have to be paid</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>WRONG, Ok is an at will hire state always has been, its about the non dues paying members getting the same deal as the dues paying.</p><p> Its kinda like putting an attorney on retainer (oh the horror of that statement) and then everyone else getting to use them.</p><p></p><p>.Misquoted numbers, I assure NOONE in the unions makes anything near that amount.</p><p>As far as the non workers , it is a little harder to get some of them out, but they are the last hired and the first let go.</p><p>And you have that in all work places, i.e. the brother-in-law that the wifey wont let you fire.</p><p>And Why should the ceo's make all the money and bonuses?</p><p> The United States of America (A Union) was built on the backs of labor, not someone sitting behind a desk (no offence intended , we need them too)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="twoguns?, post: 2014500, member: 7012"] I agree , the force of law is to make the ceo's negotiate on the same level as the unions, the many speak better than just a few . And those wages , by necessity have to be paid WRONG, Ok is an at will hire state always has been, its about the non dues paying members getting the same deal as the dues paying. Its kinda like putting an attorney on retainer (oh the horror of that statement) and then everyone else getting to use them. .Misquoted numbers, I assure NOONE in the unions makes anything near that amount. As far as the non workers , it is a little harder to get some of them out, but they are the last hired and the first let go. And you have that in all work places, i.e. the brother-in-law that the wifey wont let you fire. And Why should the ceo's make all the money and bonuses? The United States of America (A Union) was built on the backs of labor, not someone sitting behind a desk (no offence intended , we need them too) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Michigan pushes right-to-work measure(24th state in the nation to adopt R-T-W)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
