Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More science - climate change is a lie!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlugSlinger" data-source="post: 2645045" data-attributes="member: 7248"><p>What I don't understand is you liberals are arguing about how statistical models are being used in an incorrect manner, but you say nothing about your supporting information and how you change it to meet your needs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The animation below alternates between the current graph with error bars, and the 2001 version. The points from the 1880’s are nearly 300% outside of Gavin’s top error bars.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/gissfiga2001vs2014.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>They are adjusting the data by a much larger amount than their own error bars, which is scientific gibberish.</p><p></p><p>Everything about NASA temperature data reeks of propaganda. It doesn’t pass the most basic sniff tests as legitimate data. The error bars are meaningless green crayon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlugSlinger, post: 2645045, member: 7248"] What I don't understand is you liberals are arguing about how statistical models are being used in an incorrect manner, but you say nothing about your supporting information and how you change it to meet your needs. The animation below alternates between the current graph with error bars, and the 2001 version. The points from the 1880’s are nearly 300% outside of Gavin’s top error bars. [img]https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/gissfiga2001vs2014.gif[/img] They are adjusting the data by a much larger amount than their own error bars, which is scientific gibberish. Everything about NASA temperature data reeks of propaganda. It doesn’t pass the most basic sniff tests as legitimate data. The error bars are meaningless green crayon. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More science - climate change is a lie!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
