Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 2858936" data-attributes="member: 26737">They&#039;ve been talking about this for the better part of 20 years. Back in the late &#039;90s, one of my neighbors had some maps of proposed routes for an I35 bypass that came pretty damn close to my place. He said it had something to do with NAFTA and some kind of trade corridor. Whether or not it was true, I don&#039;t know, but the maps certainly looked legit.At least this loop going through Harrah would put that supposed Norman loop east of Dirtybird instead of in my back yard. If it&#039;d get the speed limit on Highway 9 back up to where it should be and get the stoplights biased more toward the highway than the side streets, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d be all that much opposed to it. (Aside from my general opposition to the gov&#039;t using eminent domain to steal private property...)As long as it&#039;s not another #%^*ing turnpike. We have enough of those stupid things.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 2858936, member: 26737"] They've been talking about this for the better part of 20 years. Back in the late '90s, one of my neighbors had some maps of proposed routes for an I35 bypass that came pretty damn close to my place. He said it had something to do with NAFTA and some kind of trade corridor. Whether or not it was true, I don't know, but the maps certainly looked legit. At least this loop going through Harrah would put that supposed Norman loop east of Dirtybird instead of in my back yard. If it'd get the speed limit on Highway 9 back up to where it should be and get the stoplights biased more toward the highway than the side streets, I'm not sure I'd be all that much opposed to it. (Aside from my general opposition to the gov't using eminent domain to steal private property...) As long as it's not another #%^*ing turnpike. We have enough of those stupid things. [/QUOTE]

Verification