Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
My biggest problem with UBCs
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jcizzle" data-source="post: 2138370" data-attributes="member: 18220"><p>This I know is not popular opinionon herr but I'll say that if ubcs could work I wouldn't ha e a problem with the. </p><p></p><p>However, I am adamantly against them because they can't work. Not without leading to the next step of forced registration. </p><p></p><p>Why would it take forced registrationto make ubcs work?</p><p></p><p>Lets say Bill is selling Bob a .223 bolt actio. Rifle for a couple hu drex bucks. They aren't best friends but have known each other for quite some time. Bill isn't gonna requireBob to spend an extra $20 plus go through the hassle himself of meeting across town or 20miles into town to a dealer for a check on Bob. After all since the gu. Isn't registered nobody will really ever know its sold or a d bill doesn't have it aanymore or that bob now owns one anyway. </p><p></p><p>Therefore the law can't be inforced. Why have a law that cant be enforced? The reason would be so that five years down the road grabbers can say we need a registration to close the "loophole" in the ubc requirements. Plus don't think they wont start saving data from transfers that do take place so they'llgave a start on the registration database already</p><p></p><p>I'm not a lawyer but that's my analysis. Taake it for what u will</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jcizzle, post: 2138370, member: 18220"] This I know is not popular opinionon herr but I'll say that if ubcs could work I wouldn't ha e a problem with the. However, I am adamantly against them because they can't work. Not without leading to the next step of forced registration. Why would it take forced registrationto make ubcs work? Lets say Bill is selling Bob a .223 bolt actio. Rifle for a couple hu drex bucks. They aren't best friends but have known each other for quite some time. Bill isn't gonna requireBob to spend an extra $20 plus go through the hassle himself of meeting across town or 20miles into town to a dealer for a check on Bob. After all since the gu. Isn't registered nobody will really ever know its sold or a d bill doesn't have it aanymore or that bob now owns one anyway. Therefore the law can't be inforced. Why have a law that cant be enforced? The reason would be so that five years down the road grabbers can say we need a registration to close the "loophole" in the ubc requirements. Plus don't think they wont start saving data from transfers that do take place so they'llgave a start on the registration database already I'm not a lawyer but that's my analysis. Taake it for what u will Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
My biggest problem with UBCs
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom