Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
My response to the brilliance in the O'Colly
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3inSlugger" data-source="post: 1877934" data-attributes="member: 18508"><p>Thank you very much for the critique. I actually wasn't aware of Obamacare being upheld outside of the Commerce Clause. However, since Congressional power to levy taxes is granted in the Constitution proper, it still proves my point.</p><p></p><p>Concerning the assumed right to privacy, I realize that the Constitution does not grant a right to privacy. However, since the target of this article was to those that lean to the left, I assumed they would assume the right to privacy was an actual right enumerated (which I think it should have been had the Founders been able to know what would happen in later generations).</p><p></p><p>I realize I took some liberties, but the concept holds true.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for commenting soonerwings! And thanks to everyone else for their comments on the O'Colly article and in this forum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3inSlugger, post: 1877934, member: 18508"] Thank you very much for the critique. I actually wasn't aware of Obamacare being upheld outside of the Commerce Clause. However, since Congressional power to levy taxes is granted in the Constitution proper, it still proves my point. Concerning the assumed right to privacy, I realize that the Constitution does not grant a right to privacy. However, since the target of this article was to those that lean to the left, I assumed they would assume the right to privacy was an actual right enumerated (which I think it should have been had the Founders been able to know what would happen in later generations). I realize I took some liberties, but the concept holds true. Thanks for commenting soonerwings! And thanks to everyone else for their comments on the O'Colly article and in this forum. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
My response to the brilliance in the O'Colly
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom