Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Need Help/Advice from Police or Lawyer
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inactive" data-source="post: 1400012" data-attributes="member: 7488"><p>I am an insurance adjuster, and these types of issues are under the scope of the homeowner's policy. So I will offer my take:</p><p></p><p>One could make a case that the owner of the large dog was somewhat responsible due to the digging and not correcting that, but the owner of the small dog was responsible for allowing it entering the property. Some ratio of comparative negligence would likely be applied. But all that would be owed is the cost of the dog.</p><p></p><p>I am not sure there was criminal action, as it was property being lost here, not a dog bite on a person or a person harming a dog. Calling the cops is probably unnecessary. Animal control may need to show up to a fractious call, or maybe not - not sure on Owasso's stance on that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>All of that said, no offense, but if this was between two of my neighbors, I wouldn't be in the middle of it. Stick a brick or log of firewood in the hole so a dog cannot get through, then fill it up with dirt more permanently when there's some daylight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inactive, post: 1400012, member: 7488"] I am an insurance adjuster, and these types of issues are under the scope of the homeowner's policy. So I will offer my take: One could make a case that the owner of the large dog was somewhat responsible due to the digging and not correcting that, but the owner of the small dog was responsible for allowing it entering the property. Some ratio of comparative negligence would likely be applied. But all that would be owed is the cost of the dog. I am not sure there was criminal action, as it was property being lost here, not a dog bite on a person or a person harming a dog. Calling the cops is probably unnecessary. Animal control may need to show up to a fractious call, or maybe not - not sure on Owasso's stance on that. All of that said, no offense, but if this was between two of my neighbors, I wouldn't be in the middle of it. Stick a brick or log of firewood in the hole so a dog cannot get through, then fill it up with dirt more permanently when there's some daylight. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Need Help/Advice from Police or Lawyer
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom