Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1910736" data-attributes="member: 3455">Am I retarded or on Obama&#039;s site it says &quot;Artists for Obama &gt; Our Stripes: Flag Print&quot;It&#039;s an artist&#039;s screen print ... Have you guys heard of first amendment?Speech includes much more than verbal oration and need not include any words. The expression of artists, including the use of symbolism, is protected under the First Amendment. The wearing of armbands with a peace symbol was protected during the Vietnam War as symbolic speech protected under the First Amendment. (Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503 [1969]) Yet the burning of a draft card was not considered protected speech but an illegal behavior violating the Selective Service rules (United States v. O&#039;Brien, 391 U.S. 367 [1968]).Sorry, I am retarded, we care only about second amendment here <img src="/images/smilies/headscratch.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":scratch:" title="Headscratch&nbsp; &nbsp; :scratch:" data-shortname=":scratch:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1910736, member: 3455"] Am I retarded or on Obama's site it says "[B]Artists[/B] for Obama > Our Stripes: Flag [B]Print[/B]" It's an [SIZE=5][B]artist's screen print[/B][/SIZE] ... Have you guys heard of first amendment? [i]Speech includes much more than verbal oration and need not include any words. The expression of [B]artists[/B], including the use of [B]symbolism[/B], is [B]protected under the First Amendment[/B]. The wearing of armbands with a peace symbol was protected during the Vietnam War as symbolic speech protected under the First Amendment. (Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503 [1969]) Yet the burning of a draft card was not considered protected speech but an illegal behavior violating the Selective Service rules (United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 [1968]).[/i] Sorry, I am retarded, we care only about second amendment here :scratch: [/QUOTE]

Verification