Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
New Pics of the Apollo 11 Landing Site
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rhodesbe" data-source="post: 1745822" data-attributes="member: 2415"><p>The 'lunar retroreflector experiment' of bouncing a beam off the moon was something I did as part of a physics lab in college.</p><p></p><p>If I remember, there are three of those reflectors up there. </p><p></p><p>The distance the beam travels can be verified by the loss of intensity of the beam. The lab calculated the loss to be like 34^-8 watts. The environmental loss was calculated to be a much smaller amount - by comparasion, lots of light gets 'lost' over that distance. This is important because there is no way that any experiment on earth can replicate light loss over such an extreme distance. It was cool, to actually 'see' a beam that had traveled to the moon and back right in front of your face. It didn't even smell funny or anything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rhodesbe, post: 1745822, member: 2415"] The 'lunar retroreflector experiment' of bouncing a beam off the moon was something I did as part of a physics lab in college. If I remember, there are three of those reflectors up there. The distance the beam travels can be verified by the loss of intensity of the beam. The lab calculated the loss to be like 34^-8 watts. The environmental loss was calculated to be a much smaller amount - by comparasion, lots of light gets 'lost' over that distance. This is important because there is no way that any experiment on earth can replicate light loss over such an extreme distance. It was cool, to actually 'see' a beam that had traveled to the moon and back right in front of your face. It didn't even smell funny or anything. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
New Pics of the Apollo 11 Landing Site
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom